[Previous entry: "Soulforce plans UMGC disruption"] [Next entry: "Moravians: check the archives"]
05/06/2004: "They mean what they say"
Just in case there are still some in Methodism who don't understand the meaning of the word "no":
In a vote of 455-445, the delegates changed Paragraph 2702 to state: "A bishop, clergy member of an annual conference, local pastor, clergy on honorable or administrative location, or diaconal minister may choose a trial when charged (subject to the statute of limitations in 2702.4) with one or more of the following offenses: a) immorality, including but not limited to, not being celibate in singleness or not being faithful in a heterosexual marriage; b) practices declared by the United Methodist Church to be incompatible with Christian teaching, including but not limited to: being a self-avowed practicing homosexual; or conducting ceremonies which celebrate homosexual unions; or performing same-sex wedding ceremonies."
The closeness of the vote was an indication that at least some people who object to the UMC approving homosexual practice were also wary of being too explicit, or too unequivocal. But a majority is a majority, and this should pretty well shut the door. Of course, there will still be those who will maintain that "not" means "may," or "incompatible" means "disputed" or whatever. But there will be no doubt whatsoever (if there ever really was) about their refusal to abide by the law of the church.


